Peer process groups, often referred to as “family groups” by our membership, are an integral part of the fabric of AAP.

These groupings are leaderless, and vary in size and composition. Participants may differ in age, gender, length of membership, and geographic location.

With enthusiasm, our elders recall the burgeoning of these early groups, describing them as providing a culture and community of intellectual excitement and experimentation. First initiated by Paul Frisch, Academy members began to demonstrate their work in process groups with each other, providing opportunities for intense personal and professional growth. Initially these groups met over the course of one meeting, but eventually the same members began to reconvene over several meetings to deepen the work that could be accomplished. In time, these ongoing meetings resulted in the development of the long-term peer groups that exist today.

The differences among the groups are many. These include origin, size, ages of members, longevity of contact, and frequency of meeting. For example, some groups have existed for 40 years while others have joined together more recently as newcomers.

The journey to find one’s place in a group is as important to personal growth as is the destination. This search is often complex and can involve attachment style, temperament, and character structure. Some groups are open and some groups are closed. The sheer number of members, the depth of personal work, and life cycle events within a group frequently determine the group’s availability for new members. It is a common myth that the only way to participate in this process is through invitation to an existing group.

Given that the peer/family group process is highly valued, and while access can be complicated, it is crucial that new groups continue to develop. For example, these new groups could be formed from newcomers joining together, from continuing an open process group, or from the blending of two previous groups. It is possible to begin a group with only two members.

Regardless of inception, the inherent value of these ongoing groups cannot be overestimated.

Through the provision of a safe container, members can engage in corrective emotional experiences, leading to their personal growth and professional development.

Written by Membership and Retention Chairs: Nelia H Rivers and Barbara Thomason

September 9, 2017

Beginning a Group: Personal Reflections

Elizabeth J. Gomart

Finding my own people at AAP was a priority after I attended my first AAP event in 2012 as a [...]

Linda Tillman

Often it’s all about timing. I joined AAP as an older person toward the end of my career. I was [...]

Carole Light

When I joined AAP in 1971 I don’t remember groups being “closed.” People wandered in and out, committing for [...]

Gary Frankel

By the fall of 1982 I had just enough therapy and supervision to be profoundly aware of a deep need [...]

Lyn Sommer

As a graduate student, I attended my first I&C in 1980, and proceeded to fall completely in love with AAP’s [...]

Lee Blackwell

My relationship with the Academy started with my doctoral supervisor inviting me to the 1974 Southeast Region meeting in New [...]

Rhona Engels

During Opening Experience of my first Summer Workshop, the open family groups were asked to stand. Bewildered, I let my [...]

Pat Webster

When I joined the Academy and came to my first Summer Workshop in late 80’s, early 90’s, I somehow quickly [...]

David Loftis

Having arrived as a brand new member at Stone Mountain in 1984, I was told that some groups were open [...]

Ed Sharp

At my first Summer Workshop in Park City, Utah in 1996, an effort was made to soften the anxiety of [...]

Grover E. Criswell

We were in a Summer Workshop in Houston, Texas in 1975 and the leaders framed the opening experience, breaking everyone [...]